JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.
Vieraskieliset / In-english

Blog: Is there a God? – I be­lie­ve there is

Vieraskieliset / In-english
25.5.2016 6.53

Juttua muokattu:

1.1. 23:32

I am sit­ting in a car with a good friend. We are re­tur­ning home from a wee­kend mu­sic cour­se. He is a scien­tist and tel­ls me he is re­a­ding a book about dark mat­ter.

– Is there dark mat­ter? I chal­len­ge him.

– Ac­cor­ding to this book, there very li­ke­ly is, alt­hough hu­mans have not been ab­le to ob­ser­ve it yet, he says cau­ti­ous­ly.

– So its exis­ten­ce is a mat­ter of faith? I con­ti­nue my chal­len­ge

– There is no wa­ter­tight scien­ti­fic proof of its exis­ten­ce, but many surp­ri­sing and in­di­rect ob­ser­va­ti­ons can be exp­lai­ned by as­su­ming that it exists, he amp­li­fies.

– We could use exact­ly the same ar­gu­ment for the exis­ten­ce of God – there is no scien­ti­fic proof, but many surp­ri­sing and in­di­rect ob­ser­va­ti­ons could be exp­lai­ned by as­su­ming that He exists. Where is the dif­fe­ren­ce? I ask.

– God can­not be ob­ser­ved, and His exis­ten­ce can­not be pro­ved by scien­ti­fic met­hods. It the­re­fo­re re­mains a mat­ter of faith. Scien­ti­fic proof is al­wa­ys ba­sed on re­li­ab­le ob­ser­va­ti­ons, me­a­su­re­ments, rep­ro­du­ci­bi­li­ty of re­sults, and mat­he­ma­ti­cal mo­del­ling of data. Be­lief in God and scien­ce are the­re­fo­re two dif­fe­rent things, he adept­ly res­pon­ses.

Our dis­cus­si­on con­ti­nu­es in con­ge­ni­al com­pa­ni­ons­hip. We move on to dis­cuss the re­la­ti­ons­hip bet­ween scien­ce and cur­rent re­a­li­ty as well as faith, inc­lu­ding li­ving faith.

We re­cent­ly read front page news of a high­ly es­tee­med scien­tist who clai­med that he was ab­le to prove that no God was nee­ded to exp­lain the ori­gin of the uni­ver­se. The news re­port imp­lied that the non-exis­ten­ce of God had the­re­by re­cei­ved conc­lu­si­ve scien­ti­fic proof.

Re­fer­ring to this pie­ce of news, a yo­ung be­lie­ver told the par­ti­ci­pants of a dis­cus­si­on eve­ning at the rau­ha­nyh­dis­tys that her un­be­lie­ving clas­s­ma­tes had been ecs­ta­tic about the news, won­de­ring why she “ne­vert­he­less wan­ted to be­lie­ve in God.” I would have li­ked to go and con­so­le her and say that no-one can scien­ti­fi­cal­ly prove eit­her the exis­ten­ce or the non-exis­ten­ce of God, not now, nor in the fu­tu­re.

Many of the at­tempts to prove that God does not exist point out the mys­te­ry of suf­fe­ring and evil and the lack of ra­ti­o­nal lo­gic in this di­lem­ma: ”If God is good and al­migh­ty, why is there evil in the world? If God pro­mi­sed to pro­tect be­lie­vers, why have there been big ca­tast­rop­hes where many be­lie­vers have died?”

Anot­her claim to sup­port the non-exis­ten­ce of God is evo­lu­ti­on: ”In the old ti­mes ig­no­rant pe­op­le tried to exp­lain mys­te­ries by the pre­sen­ce of God, but pe­op­le have gra­du­al­ly found na­tu­ral exp­la­na­ti­ons for eve­ryt­hing that used to be unexp­lai­nab­le.” There are al­so the­o­ries of God and re­li­gi­on as an eli­tist cons­pi­ra­cy against com­mon pe­op­le. And these are on­ly some of the claims that have been made to prove that God does not exist.

In the same way, there are al­so ar­gu­ments for the exis­ten­ce of God. The hu­man mind can choo­se to ac­cept eit­her ap­p­ro­ach.

Many pe­op­le pic­tu­re God as a white-be­ar­ded old man sit­ting on a cloud, or some ot­her hu­man-like spi­ri­tu­al being, who cont­rols man­kind and the world ac­cor­ding to his will and pre­fe­ren­ces. There is not­hing wrong with ima­gi­ning things, but any­bo­dy who does so ba­sed on their own view of a be­ne­vo­lent, om­ni­po­tent, and just God will end up with a ma­jor mis­con­cep­ti­on.

Ac­cor­ding to the Bib­le, God is far from anyt­hing like that. He is: one God and Fat­her of all, who is over all and through all and in all. (Eph. 4:6.)

As Paul says, God has cre­a­ted all things, go­verns all things, and is ef­fec­ti­ve­ly pre­sent in all things. Hen­ce He is not out­si­de His cre­a­ti­on but om­nip­re­sent in it. This helps us un­ders­tand that not even a hair can drop from a per­son’s head wit­hout God kno­wing and per­mit­ting it.

The ca­pa­ci­ty of God to inf­lu­en­ce the events of life and na­tu­re is an in­te­res­ting to­pic, but the ul­ti­ma­te is­sue is the qu­es­ti­on of exis­ten­ce it­self. Why is there so­met­hing ins­te­ad of there being not­hing? And we should not li­mit this qu­es­ti­on to me­re­ly ma­te­ri­al re­a­li­ty, but should inc­lu­de the en­ti­re idea, phe­no­me­non, and po­ten­ti­al of exis­ten­ce.

What can be known about God is ma­ni­fest to pe­op­le be­cau­se God has made it ma­ni­fest to them. His in­vi­sib­le at­t­ri­bu­tes, na­me­ly His eter­nal po­wer and di­vi­ne na­tu­re, have been ma­ni­fest and ob­ser­vab­le in His works sin­ce the cre­a­ti­on of the world. So pe­op­le have no ex­cu­se. Alt­hough they knew God, they did not ho­nor and prai­se him as God. (Rom. 1:19–21.)

The ba­sic qu­es­ti­on of exis­ten­ce can­not be ans­we­red by scien­ce. Just like a pain­ting pre-re­qui­res a can­vas to be pain­ted on and a thought pre-re­qui­res so­me­o­ne to think it, so God is a ne­ces­sa­ry pre­re­qui­si­te for exis­ten­ce. God cal­led Him­self “I-who-am” or, if in­terp­re­ted dif­fe­rent­ly, “He-who-cal­ls-eve­ryt­hing-in­to-exis­ten­ce”, when Mo­ses wan­ted to know whom he should name as the sen­der of the mes­sa­ge to his pe­op­le.

Thus, ac­cor­ding to the Bib­le, the whole exis­ting re­a­li­ty with its laws and re­gu­la­ri­ties tes­ti­fies of God, His work and His po­wer. Eve­ryt­hing has been vi­sib­le to man ever sin­ce the cre­a­ti­on. The on­ly cru­ci­al qu­es­ti­on is whet­her man wants to be­lie­ve and to ack­now­led­ge that all things have been cre­a­ted by God’s word.

Juha Ha­ku­li­nen

Trans­la­ti­on: S-L.L.

The blog post was pub­lis­hed in on­li­ne Päi­vä­mies on 7 Feb. 2016


Ku­kaan, joka pu­huu Ju­ma­lan Hen­gen val­taa­ma­na, ei voi sa­noa: "Jee­sus on ki­rot­tu." Ku­kaan ei myös­kään voi sa­noa: "Jee­sus on Her­ra", muu­ten kuin Py­hän Hen­gen vai­ku­tuk­ses­ta. 1 Kor. 12:3

Viikon kysymys